Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Note
Cutting, J. E., & Proffitt, D. R.The minimum principle and the perception of absolute, common, and relative motions. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1980. bl]References
Boring, E. G. Visual perception as invariance.Psychological Review, 1952,59, 141–148.
Gogel, W. C. The metric of visual Space. In W. Epstein (Ed.),Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and processes. New York: Wiley, 1977.
Gogel, W. C. The sensing of retinal motion.Perception & Psychophysics, 1980,211, 155–163.
Hay, J. C., &Goldsmith, W. M. Space-time adaptation of visual position constancy.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,99, 1–9.
Hill, A. L. Direction constancy.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11, 175–178.
Köhler, W. Physical Gestalten. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.),A sourcebook of Gestalt psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1938. (Originally published, 1920.)
Matin, E., Clyler, A. B., &Matin, L. Metacontrast and saccadic suppression.Science, 1972,178, 179–182.
Proffitt, D. R., &Cutting, J. E. An invariant for wheelgenerated motions and the logic of its determination.Perception, 1980,9, 435–449.
Restle, F. Coding theory of the perception of motion configurations.Psychological Review, 1979,86, 1–24.
Shebilske, W. L. Visuomotor coordination in visual direction and position constancies. In W. Epstein (Ed.),Stability and constancy in visual perception: Mechanisms and Processes. New York: Wiley, 1977.
Wallactt, H., Frey, K. J. Adaptation in distance perception based on oculomotor cues.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11, 31–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The preparation of this paper was supported by NIE Grant R01-EY02291-03 awarded to Wayne L. Shebilske, NIH Grant MH35530 awarded to James E. Cutting and Dennis R. Proffitt, and a grant from the University of Virginia Research Policy Council to Dennis R. Proffitt.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shebilske, W.L., Proffitt, D.R. The priority of perceived distance for perceiving motion has not been demonstrated: Critical comments on Gogel’s “The sensing of retinal motion”. Perception & Psychophysics 29, 170–172 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207281
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207281